Thursday, June 25, 2020

This time, crane hunt may be serious



By David Horst

Wisconsin’s Natural Resources Board clearly has a taste for sandhill crane.

They discussed the possibility of a crane hunt at their June 24 virtual meeting. Three times in the past seven years, Wisconsin’s Conservation Congress voted for a sandhill crane hunt. Nothing came of it. Nothing comes of a lot of Conservation Congress votes. The hearings, held all around the state, always have a noisy “shoot it if it moves” minority.

But this is not a bunch of aging hunters down at the town hall telling how they’d like things to be. This is a state board with actual oversight powers over the Department of Natural Resources. The Board heard a report on the status of Wisconsin’s sandhill crane population, called for by member William Bruins, a dairy farmer from Waupun. 

The facts were laid out by Taylor Finger, DNR migratory game bird specialist. He showed a graph of the sandhill population growth that started with next to zero 30 years ago and has grown to 90,000 birds in the fall count. The growth has been dramatic in recent years.

That led Bruins to ask Finger if it wasn’t obvious that a hunt was needed. Board Chair Frederick Prehn, a dentist, cranberry grower and gun store owner from Wausau, took Finger off the hook, saying he appeared with the understanding he would only present facts and not draw any conclusions about whether a hunt was or was not justified.

Finger’s response brought in another point of view. He said there is also a “social consideration.” Sandhill cranes are big, charismatic birds, he said, that 30 years ago weren’t seen in Wisconsin. His hand tipped the other way when he took away one of the arguments always presented by hunt opponents. Asked if endangered whooping cranes mixed in with the sandhill flock might be killed by mistake, he said hunts of our eastern sandhill flock already allowed in Kentucky. Tennessee and, most recently, Alabama have produced no reports of whoopers mistakenly shot.

There actually are already two types of crane hunts in Wisconsin. Farmers, after trying other required techniques for mitigating crop loss, can be given permits to shoot cranes. But they aren’t allowed to eat what they shoot. Native tribes can shoot up to 50 cranes a year. Finger said they’ve never come close to taking half that number.

My interest in cranes is not how they taste, but the flavor they bring to my life. We get regular visits from sandhills. They are grace in motion. We watch them stretch and preen. As I write this, a pair stands at the edge of our backyard calling out what I can only interpret as, “Give ’em hell.”

I take part in the annual Midwest Crane Count and my numbers have been stable. I am seeing cranes more places.

The arguments will be the same as before. Stories of cranes walking down a row of corn seedlings and gobbling them all down. Descriptions of blast-happy hunters that don’t want the meat, they just want to kill.

I’ve never seen a crane devour a row of corn. I did see one snark up a mouse or a vole the other day. I get a big kick out of watching them land or take off or communicate with their dance of hopping and wing flapping. I have as much right to the joy they bring me as hunters have to the satisfaction of shooting them.

There were clearly a couple votes on the NRB opposed to the hunt. Given the number of hunters and farmers on the board, I think I know which way this is going to go. Watch the meeting video at this link and handicap it for yourself.

Chairman Prehn said he would talk with DNR Secretary Preston Cole over the summer to decide if the agency and the board will ask for a hunt together or the board will go it alone – if the board so decides.

No matter how that vote goes, an actual hunt would require action by the Wisconsin Legislature. We have indecision and partisanship working for us there. Jump on the issue with your legislators now if you feel strongly about a crane hunt.

Because of their beauty, size and graceful movement, cranes are considered sacred in many cultures. Here, we have to ask, is nothing sacred anymore. I think the answer is clear.

Thursday, November 7, 2019

Check out the winter edition of Wisconsin Natural Resources

The winter edition of Wisconsin Natural Resources magazine includes my feature on Pat Fisher, who runs The Feather bird rehabilitation center in New London. You will find it at https://dnr.wi.gov/wnrmag/

Here are links to my previous stories in Wisconsin Natural Resources and other stories I've done on Pat.

Paddle Tales (WNR)
Journals of canoe trips long ago


Natural Leader, Nature Champion (WNR)
Gordon Bubolz's other natural areas


Injured eagle lifted by helping hands







Sunday, May 26, 2019

Taking sides in survival of the fittest

By David Horst

You never know what you'll see out of our
window to wildlife
That whole food chain/survival of the fittest thing looks a lot better in theory than on the hoof.

We were looking out the window to wildlife in our living room one evening. About 10 deer and a pair of sandhill cranes were out there. I believed them to be the same cranes we had seen several days earlier.

On that evening, one crane landed and then the other. The first started running in a straight line with its wings stretched out. It looked pretty threatening, so I assumed it was territorial. This display went on for a bit until it became clear these were not two males drawing a line in the sand. They were a couple having a roll in the hay. The show might happen again, so we were keeping an eye out.

The deer were acting oddly. They looked around nervously and flashed their flags – the white underside of their tails – signaling danger. Then the deer were on the move. They closed ranks and took off east. Shot from the brush came a low, brown, speeding figure. It was a coyote and it was gaining. It also was getting near to the cranes, 4-foot-tall birds that need some time and space to get airborne.

The coyote was just performing its role at the top of the food chain. Actually, they call it a food web now. It’s more complicated than just a straight chain. But seeing the coyote claim the rights that go with being at the top of the web was not going to be pretty.

As it turned out, the cranes took their cue from the deer and had made short work of getting up higher than a coyote’s leap. The deer bolted into the woods. The coyote made an about-face and raced back to the west.

The evening light was dimming, but the deer all appeared to have escaped, as had the cranes.

I’m perfectly aware that an individual one way or the other won’t make a bit of difference in the deer population. Coyotes gotta eat, too. But I was cheering for the deer.

Everybody still holds their positions on the food web, so the scene is likely to be repeated, possibly with a different ending.

The cranes returned quickly after the coyote disappeared. They settled down into the hay field. One stretched out its neck and ran with its head down.

That’s another force in nature that continues the food web.

Sunday, April 14, 2019

Count on cranes to know weather

By David Horst

Sandhill crane mating behavior 
I took part in the annual Midwest Crane Count Saturday morning. That means being in place at your assigned counting area by 5:30 a.m. and staying there counting until 7:30 a.m.At 33 degrees with a stiff wind, the sandhill cranes had the good sense to stay in the woods until 6:38 a.m.

Snow from this year’s April storm still lined the rows between the corn stubble. It was better than last year’s April storm, which prevented me from getting to my site.

After an hour of seeing no cranes, the weeds and fence posts start to take on that role, until you fine tune the focus on the spotting scope.A good spotting scope is a big help on the crane count. The cranes aren’t really interested in being close to you. I could make out their figures in the morning light, but the scope allowed me to see what they were doing and get a more accurate count.
At 6:38 I finally saw two birds feeding in the field. By 6:50 there were four. At 6:58, six. At 7:10, 10 cranes. That would hold steady as my count, just as 33 held steady as the temperature.
The behavior I recorded for all 10 was “walking and feeding.” In warmer years, I sometimes saw mating behavior — cranes hopping up and down with their wings spread, or even tossing a small stick into the air repeatedly. Hey, who’s to judge what turns on another species.

This year I left all of the checkboxes for mating behavior blank. But I was still out in nature, watching the morning come. And I had the company of 10 very large, impressive birds.

Annual Midwest Crane Counts

  • 2019 (10 cranes)
  • 2018 missed due to weather
  • 2017 missed due to illness
  • 2016 (28 cranes)
  • 2015 (32 cranes)
  • 2014 (15 cranes)
  • 2012 (9 cranes)
  • 2010  (9 cranes, 1 county supervisor)
  • 2009 (15 cranes, 2 children, 0 whining)
  • 2008 (26 cranes)